From now on, you have to start your Twitter feed every morning with a knock-knock joke.Zimmerman attorney's opening statement included a knock-knock joke. Not making this up. Check it out for yourself.
— Greg Mitchell (@GregMitch) June 25, 2013
Great John Cassidy piece at The New Yorker on D.C. pols and media vs. Snowden & Greenwald. He backs the latter. http://t.co/R1Iu58hsun
— Greg Mitchell (@GregMitch) June 25, 2013
"Mr. Zimmer had difficulty accepting the fact that Men's Wearhouse is a public company" http://t.co/iaKBEhdCqp" The Board is unanimously of the view that now is not the time to sell the company. The Board is committed to a strategic plan carefully developed by CEO Doug Ewert and the rest of the company's experienced management team, which we all believe will maximize long-term value for all shareholders."
— Kim Bhasin (@KimBhasin) June 25, 2013
[Shorter version: We've worked whole careers for this moment. It's time to cash in our chips and make a killing.]
But this may be a more balanced explanation than mine...
Men's Wearhouse reveals why George Zimmer was fired — dramatic statement blasts founder http://t.co/2D3F3yqLJs
— Kim Bhasin (@KimBhasin) June 25, 2013
Foreign friends #Cairo,if you didn't already, go to an ATM machine today & get money enough for a week. I know Egyptian already did that :-)
— Alfred Raouf (@Kemety) June 25, 2013
" A conventional analysis would call this approach cruel, bordering on sociopathic." http://t.co/oz0Q1w4PJcHe's referring to the Paul Ryan Eat the Poor approach to poverty.
— AdamSerwer (@AdamSerwer) June 25, 2013
Just last week, the House provided another example of Ryan’s anti-poverty principles in action. It enacted a large cut in food stamps, as Ryan has been calling for. Then, concluding this hadn’t gone far enough, it added a provision allowing states to cut off beneficiaries who didn’t have a job. As Robert Greenstein explained, this was completely unlike the welfare provisions designed to encourage people to get jobs:
Work requirements in low-income programs require unemployed people to look for jobs, to accept any job offer, to participate in workforce or training programs if there is a slot available in a program, and the like. If the individuals fail to comply with the requirements, they can be sanctioned by having their benefits cut or terminated. The SNAP program also disqualifies people who quit a job.
This is not what the Southerland amendment would do. It would allow states to end benefits for most adults who receive or apply for SNAP — including parents with young children and many people with disabilities — if they are not working or participating in a work or training program for at least 20 hours a week. The amendment provides no jobs and no funds for work or training programs, and it does not require states to make any work opportunities available. People who want to work and are looking for a job but haven’t found one could be cut off.
A conventional analysis would call this approach cruel, bordering on sociopathic. It’s one thing to tailor policy to encourage people to work. It’s another to create a new punishment for people who can’t find jobs. And given the baseline reality of mass unemployment for low-skilled workers, and a bill that proposes nothing to create more jobs or even job training, the Southerland amendment would do nothing but punish the poor. Ryan voted for it, naturally.
This. RT @benjaminja: The military will set up two recruiting booths at SF's gay pride parade this year http://t.co/TgWQtr5DmF
— diva o. policy (@jejunebug) June 25, 2013
One more thing #Snowden has revealed - that U.S. global hegemony is clearly vastly overrated
— Tom Watson (@tomwatson) June 25, 2013
Rape in the Fields--A Damning Accumulation of Facts: Watch a disturbing dark side of US #immigration @PBS tonight http://t.co/fvwhk0nOjq
— Raju Narisetti (@rajunarisetti) June 25, 2013
Is anybody surprised? Really?
Lebanese editor writes an op-ed asking Assad to give him $700,000. Shocking. Lebanese newspaper bribes have gone down so much.
— Karl Sharro (@KarlreMarks) June 25, 2013
When Israel, US are asking for negotiations w/o preconditions they mean conditions only for Palestinians http://t.co/2XHyftcsk0
— noam sheizaf (@nsheizaf) June 25, 2013
If #Russia's foreign minister says #Snowden has not crossed border into Russia, then he's still at Moscow airport. It's a Tom Hanks movie
— Luke Baker (@LukeReuters) June 25, 2013
It's George Orwell's birthday. @twitofgus discusses the thing that scared Orwell the most. http://t.co/N36Mgtm5gGAlthough "1984" is Orwell's most terrifying novel, its portrayal of a totalitarian surveillance state remains a work of science fiction. His other novels, however, show how in contemporary society people everywhere are trapped by the relentless march of progress, capitalism, commercialism, communism, and other negative aspects of modern society. Orwell warned us about all of it.
— Joseph Weisenthal (@TheStalwart) June 25, 2013
Obama goes against his own Whistleblower Policy to hunt Snowden like a dog for exposing him!! @hempoilcures pic.twitter.com/7XAuBiaOJW
— HCS (@hankishtwit) June 25, 2013
Just want to send a shout-out to all the NSA guys reading my email. Hey, I'm glad one of us is. What's up guys and thanks.
— Xeni Jardin (@xeni) June 25, 2013
CHART OF THE DAY: Home prices go wild http://t.co/Rz1siMOSgwI think Tom Watson's on to something...
— Joseph Weisenthal (@TheStalwart) June 25, 2013
"Let's be honest - how many progressives of color are critical of President Obama in context of #Snowden #NSA security etc - why is that?
Perhaps it's because they perceive an angrier personal tone in the criticism of the President from a corps of critics that is whiter than the guest list at a Paula Deen dinner party?
Perhaps it's because they perceive an angrier personal tone in the criticism of the President from a corps of critics that is whiter than the guest list at a Paula Deen dinner party?
Let's be honest here, folks.
Every time a civil libertarian praises Ron or Rand Paul, a progressive of color asks, "who are these $#%& crackers?" #justafact #faceit
— Tom Watson (@tomwatson) June 25, 2013
This is long enough for one post. More later.
Different links. Stay tuned.
No comments:
Post a Comment