Just caught the end of that interview w the Afghanistan expert discussing AID and yrs of development. Impressive guy, white beard, spoke of 32 radio stations, currency & much more. You called him Andrew. What is his whole name & bio?
Thanks.
Thanks to her prompt reply and follow-up I was able to link that interview at both of my social media accounts, Twitter and Facebook. Natsios is clearly a keenly insightful expert on the Afghanistan backstory and Zak is a rising star in my book.
20 years of US presence permanently changed Afghanistan.
One sign: the smart phones thousands are using to communicate with the world or coordinate their escapes. In 2001 there were no cell phones, just a few sat phones carried by journos, spies or soldiers. I saw one landline. In Nov. 2001 I crossed the Amy Darya river on a ferry that made me think of the River Styx. My sat phone relied on a fragile cable. I had an extra; but I believe another journo swiped it. When my last cable broke, the nearest replacement was likely in Moscow. Somehow I fixed it.
The one landline I saw was in an official's office in Sheberghan. I watched a man dial a number on it. The number had three digits. That's how few phones were on that particular phone exchange. The man dialed several times. Nobody answered.
In recent days we've heard voices from different parts of Afghanistan. A network of veterans in the US helps Afghan comrades get out, making calls or sending documents from thousands of miles away. Soldiers at Kabul airport call refugees and guide them in through the streets.
If the Taliban consolidate power, they may well restrain or censor the network, as their neighbors China and Iran have done. But unless they literally blow up the cell towers, as they once blew up ancient statues, they won't fully reproduce Afghanistan's old isolation.
Some Afghans have blue eyes. I've heard people speculate that they may be descendants of the army of Alexander the Great, which crossed the the Amu Darya 2,400 years ago. Improbable though that old tale may be, it suggests how long Alexander's army has persisted in memory there.
In the same way it seems likely that the American presence in Afghanistan will persist long after the last US troops leave. The Taliban inherit a different country than the one they lost in 2001. They may well try to smash that legacy. But it will be not be easy to erase.
Notes for future reference in no particular order...
Taliban takeover could mean more deaths of women and LGBTQ people in Afghanistan
By Victoria A. Brownworth -August 18, 2021
The scenes out of Kabul are brutal and harrowing. They of course evoke the fall of Saigon. But also the fall of Srebrenica.
The Taliban took control over Afghanistan on August 15 — two decades after the extremists were driven out of power by American-led military action. The Taliban had risen to power in 1994.
As the Taliban secured city after city, women activists, politicians and educators spoke to international media about their fears of reprisal. Fears grounded in historical precedent. In a U.S. State Department report from 2001, the Taliban decreed women had to wear coverings from head to toe, were not allowed to work, and were barred from attending schools. Women’s healthcare was restricted. Women were not allowed to leave their homes unless they were accompanied by male relatives. The windows of houses had to be painted over to stop outsiders from seeing women in their homes.
On August 17 there were credible sources, including statements by witnesses and victims, of Taliban sending girls back from school and women from their work. In an interview with @BBCYaldaHakim, a Taliban commander said girls cannot have education and endorsed stoning and amputation as reprisals.
As the horrific scenes of total chaos at the airports and along the streets have played out on CNN, criticism of the Biden administration’s decision to withdraw the last of the U.S.’s troops from Afghanistan has come from all quarters, right and left.
In an astonishing lack of self-awareness, George W. Bush has opined about his concerns for the women of Afghanistan. Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) also lambasted President Biden.
Yet it was Bush who led the U.S. into Afghanistan with the orchestration of Vice President Dick Cheney, Liz Cheney’s father.
History exists for a reason, and revisionist historical takes are not the same as actual history. The people who know this best are the historically marginalized and vulnerable: women and LGBTQ people — the very people most at risk now in an Afghanistan under extremist Taliban control.
History says the Bushes and Cheneys should be reserving their critiques for themselves.
When I was reporting from London in the late 1980s, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush and Margaret Thatcher were working in concert to create the entity we now call the Taliban. They were to be the antidote to the Soviets in Afghanistan. But then they became their own threat — and to more than just dissidents, women and LGBTQ people.
I wrote about the Taliban blowing up the giant Buddhas of the Bamiyan Valley in Afghanistan in early 2001. But by that time women had already been ushered back into their homes, girls taken out of schools, gays and lesbians made invisible.
The Taliban decreed in 1996 that women and girls be barred from education, work and travel without a male chaperone. The punishments for violations were severe and could even be death by stoning, as depicted in the 2008 film The Stoning of Soraya M., although that film takes place in Iran.
Punishments for LGBT+ Afghans were also severe. Mere existence was illegal. Death was, as it is for women who disobey Sharia law, the ultimate penalty.
When the U.S. looks to lay blame for who caused the current crisis, the answer is — uncomfortably — the U.S. The U.S., over decades, wreaked a level of havoc that perhaps couldn’t have been anticipated. Yet until Biden, some could argue, no attempt was made to fix it.
Donald Trump made things worse, of course. Trump negotiated the release from prison of Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar in 2018. In 2020, then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, about whom I reported in PGN repeatedly throughout 2019 and 2020, negotiated a deal with the Mullah — not with the legitimate government of Afghanistan.
That deal released 5,000 Taliban men from prison. Men who had terrorized women, girls, LGBT+, dissidents. Now the Mullah is the head of the new Taliban-led government, and Biden is beholden to that Trump/Pompeo treaty.
Yet on August 17, Trump claimed what is happening in Afghanistan is the greatest humiliation for the U.S. Many would argue that was January 6, when there was an attempted coup at the Capitol, fomented by Trump and led by his followers.
The perils in Afghanistan are very real, regardless of which side of the aisle is speaking its own ideologically perceived truth. And the Biden administration, while perhaps correct to withdraw the last of America’s stabilizing presence in Afghanistan, has been stunningly tone deaf in how it has addressed the crisis, as well as in their descriptions of the Afghan people.
Those who concern me most, as a journalist who reported on the last takeover by the Taliban, are the women, girls and LGBT+ people of Afghanistan. It would be impossible to overstate the terrors they each face, now, simply by the mere fact of their existence in a male-dominated, cis-het society in which they have no real place and in which they are at best second-class citizens with no autonomy.
Reporters in Afghanistan are already detailing the threat. And if they weren’t, the Taliban leadership has itself been succinct: Sharia law — Islamic law, religious law — will define everything in Afghanistan going forward. Within that construct there is no room for female, queer or trans autonomy.
Imposition of the death penalty for homosexuality has been classified as judicial murder of gay and lesbian people; a form of genocide. Yet it is, according to Afghans and human rights advocates, imminent.
On August 16, Nemat Sadat, the first gay Afghan to come out publicly, tweeted: “It’s not hyperbole to say that the Taliban will do what Nazis did to homosexuals: weed them out and exterminate them from Afghan society. Please help.”
Last month, Gul Rahim, a Taliban judge, told the German newspaper Bild that, “There are only two penalties for gays: either stoning or they have to stand behind a wall that falls on them. The wall must be 2.5 to 3 meters [about 10 feet] high.”
I have reported on “corrective rape” and honor killings of lesbians for various publications. I reported on lesbian asylum seekers fleeing Sharia law to the U.K. and stringent new asylum laws here in the U.S.
NGOs have reported for years that gay men and lesbians have been raped as punishment–which the U.S. government knows. “[Gays and lesbians] continued to face arrest by security forces and discrimination, assault, and rape,” said the U.S. State Department’s country report on Afghanistan in 2020.
Nemat Sadat pleaded, “Please help.”
The question now, with more than enough blame to go around, is where will that help — for women, girls, and LGBT+ people — come from? Or will it come at all?
Victoria A. Brownworth is a Pulitzer Prize-nominated award-winning journalist whose work has appeared in The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer, Baltimore Sun, DAME, The Advocate, Bay Area Reporter and Curve among other publications. She was among the OUT 100 and is the author and editor of more than 20 books.
Ok, since no one seems to know any of the history of Afghanistan before this week, a refresher:
• 2/29/20: There are 13,000 US troops there. Trump reaches deal with Taliban. Agrees Afghanistan Gov, which is not part of deal, will release 5,000 Taliban fighters. Requires Taliban to take action against al Qaeda, not to attack US troops or coalition forces, or launch high-profile attacks.
• 3/1/20: Afghan president freaks out, says US has no authority to commit to release prisoners held by Afghanistan. (Trump Admin forces it to happen anyway.) Despite there agreement not to attack any provincial capitals, Taliban unilaterally attacks Afghan forces in Helmand province.
• 3/19/2020: DOD IG says U.S. cut troop levels by more than 4,000, even though “Taliban escalated violence further after signing the agreement".
• 8/18/2020: DOD IG releases report saying Taliban didnt distance itself from terrorist organizations in Afghanistan. UN and U.S. "Taliban continued to support al-Qaeda, and conducted joint attacks with al-Qaeda members against Afghan National Defense and Security Forces.” In other words *every element of the agreement - dont attack, renounce terrorists, don't work with terrorists - had been violated.
• 9/3/2020: Afghanistan, pressured by Trump, has been releasing the 5,000 Taliban in jail. Last 400 released this day. They return to fighting.
• 9/16/2020: In continued violation of the Trump agreement, Taliban - reportedly working with al Qaeda - attacks 3 provinces in Northern Afghanistan. Immediately after election, Trump Admin leaks they're going to do a massive, rapid withdrawal of US troops before inauguration. Distressed by reports, Rubio warns of “a Saigon-type of situation." McConnell says "would hurt our allies & delight the people who wish us harm".
• 11/17/2020: Without consulting with incoming administration, which is still being blocked from security briefings, Trump Admin announces rapid withdrawal of troops down to 2,500 by 5 days before inauguration. That's down from 13,000 the year before. This was playing with people's lives. This was incompetence writ large. But here is where Biden screws up - by not more fully reversing the nonsense Trump had done.
• 2/3/2021: Afghan Study Group, created by Congress, urges Biden to abandon the Trump timetable, and set withdrawal on all sides - both Afghan government and Taliban - meeting all commitments under a peace framework that had been reached. So, it would be based on status, not date.
• 3/25: Gen Richard Clarke of Central Op Command says Taliban has not met its obligations under treaties & frameworks.
• 4/14: Biden sets a deadline of 9/11 for getting out of Afghanistan, ignoring recommendation of the working group. This is the big mistake.
• 4/18: Trump rants and raves, saying Biden should start pulling everyone out beginning in about 2 weeks, so yes, Biden made a mistake. But we are dealing with a situation where the former president pulled down troop levels to a ridiculous level just five days before inauguration, ignored attacks and violations of a treaty he hit, and pretended he had succeeded. He gave them 5,000 fighters.
I mean, look at this: The Taliban was violating *every term* of the treaty, and Trump pulled out 1000s of troops. Other than setting ourselves up for a firefight with the Taliban, the only options seemed to be bringing people back in, changing the timeline or this. I don't know. Its a cluster.
I'm not even sure I can call what Biden did a mistake. Did they have intel that the Taliban, which had been moving forward since Trump struck his stupid deal, was planning to attack our troops? Who were way outmanned? I don't know.
But this idea that this had some other easy solution or if - instead, as Rubio & McConnell said in December - the rapid drawdown of troops by Trump set up a disaster, a Saigon-type situation that was handed off to Biden, I don't know.
But this is what you get when you allow violations of treaties, petulant troop withdrawals, and media who seems to have no memory, and a political party hopeful that no one will remember.
I am not excusing Biden. I just want experts to say, given the actual situation he was handed, how it should have been done.
Kurt Alexander Eichenwald is an American journalist and a New York Times bestselling author of five books, one of which, The Informant (2000), was made into a motion picture in 2009. Formerly he was a senior writer and investigative reporter with The New York Times, Condé Nast's business magazine, Portfolio, and later was a contributing editor with Vanity Fair and a senior writer with Newsweek.
The Taliban have started to use any means at their disposal to track down the people they see as a threat to their rule, even going to local mosques or using corrupt police officers to find information, despite showing a conciliatory face to the world. The FRANCE 24 Observers spoke with five activists and journalists from all over Afghanistan, who all report that the Taliban are beginning searches in their regions.
Several days after taking control of Afghanistan, the Taliban has begun searching for journalists and activists, using house-to-house searches or intimidation tactics to target people they see as a threat. According to our Observers, house-to-house searches have been held in at least four provincial cities as the Taliban solidifies its hold on the country. (The FRANCE 24 Observers team has chosen not to publish the names of any locations in this article, for security reasons.)
The Islamist group went house-to-house on Wednesday to find a Deutsche Welle journalist – who they didn’t know had moved to Germany. When they were unable to find the journalist, they shot dead one of his relatives and seriously injured another. The Taliban have raided the homes of at least three DW journalists, the German broadcaster reported.
The Taliban is also conducting “targeted door-to-door visits” and screening people at checkpoints to find people who worked with US and NATO forces, according to an intelligence report prepared for the UN and released Friday. The report says the Taliban is "intensifying the hunt-down of all individuals and collaborators with the former regime".
The searches come amid the Taliban's sophisticated PR campaign with the group claiming to protect women's rights within the limits of Islam and to forgive all those who worked with US forces. At the group’s first press conference on August 17, Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid said, “Let me remind you that we forgive everyone, because it is in the interest of peace and stability in Afghanistan. All the groups that were confronting us are all forgiven.”
As evacuations out of Afghanistan remain difficult, foreign auxiliaries, journalists and activists who are stuck in the country are now living in fear that the Taliban will knock on their doors.
‘Taliban fighters are going to the neighbourhood mosque and asking people if they are aware of activists’
Zarghuna (not her real name) is a human rights activist who has gone into hiding since the Taliban entered her city in western Afghanistan.
I’m well-known in my city for my work as a human rights activist. Everyone knows me in my neighbourhood and on my street. When the Taliban entered our city, I hid out in a friend’s house because I knew they’d come for us sooner or later. A day or two after I moved, some of my neighbours whom I kept contact with told me Taliban fighters were going to the neighbourhood mosque and asking people if they are aware of activists, journalists or anyone else that has worked with foreigners – either in NGOs or with foreign security forces. Apparently, the Taliban told them that it’s their Islamic duty to share this information with them.
Going to mosques to find information makes sense for them, because they think that people in mosques are their fans and supporters. They think they will cooperate with them. I don’t know if they’ve been able to find my previous address yet. They were apparently able to find one of my colleague’s addresses this way, through supporters in the mosque. On August 18, the Taliban raided my colleague’s house, but luckily my colleague and my colleague’s family had already moved like me and the house was empty.
The Taliban has started their house-to-house searches to look for activists. They haven’t announced it officially and they don’t do it openly, they just try to find the targets they are looking for and hunt them “surgically” to avoid a buzz.
Mosques have been an important tool for the Taliban’s roundups. Rashid (not his real name), a human rights activist in northeastern Afghanistan, told us that a Taliban member has used a local mosque to announce their intentions to hunt down people.
Today [August 20, 2021] in the Friday prayers, a Taliban imam in our city openly said: “We have lists of people who were collaborating with foreigners. They are corrupt.” They invited the people praying to cooperate with the Taliban to find journalists and activists. There is no more future in Afghanistan for me, I have to get out of here.
‘Some corrupt police officers in our city are employed by the Taliban’
Reza (not his real name) is a human rights activist in northern Afghanistan.
Friends have told us that some corrupt police officers in our city are employed by the Taliban. The Taliban have made a task force with these officers. They are using the Afghan police’s resources and records to get details about activists and journalists – where they live, where they used to work and who they worked with. The Taliban are even getting information about activists from police officers, such as their ethnicity, religion or affiliation with political parties.
With the lists they have created with the help of the police officers, they have started to go house to house and search in our city. We can’t see any other option but to find a way to leave the country. If I stay, I’ll risk not only my life but the safety of my family.
The Taliban has targeted several Afghan journalists in recent weeks, including Nematullah Hemat of the private television station Ghargasht TV, who is believed to have been kidnapped from southern Helmand province, and Toofan Omar, the head of the private radio station Paktia Ghag Radio, who was shot and killed in Kabul.
‘A few days ago, the Taliban local commander summoned all the journalists and activists in our region to a meeting’
However, some witnesses have reported that the Taliban is still attempting to maintain a conciliatory image and liaise with activists and journalists. One journalist, Ahmad (not his real name), said Taliban officials in his town summoned journalists to a meeting to reassure them, but they were not convinced.
In the days after the Taliban captured our city, people didn’t dare to leave their homes, but now they are less afraid to go out. So far in our region, I haven’t heard of any persecution, or attempts to arrest journalists or activists yet. On the surface, there’s nothing to fear. But in reality, it’s very frightening. A few days ago, the Taliban local commander summoned all the journalists and activists in our region to a meeting with him.
We went there and, at first, everything seemed nice and friendly. He told us that we could continue working, as long as we do it within the limits of Islamic Sharia law and Taliban surveillance. But in the middle of our meeting, some armed men came into the room and showed us their weapons. The message was received: you can do whatever you want to do, but you should not mess with the Taliban. Now I’m more afraid than ever before.
‘They are repeating exactly what they did in our region in 1996’
Mustafa (not his real name), a journalist in eastern Afghanistan, says that the Taliban’s methods are nothing new.
Maybe some other journalists or activists are too young to remember, but in the 1990s, the Taliban did exactly the same thing. At first, they behaved: they were nice with people, including journalists and activists. Then, when they felt safe in their position, they showed their true colours, and everyone knows what they did back then. The Taliban have not changed. We don’t have a “moderate Taliban". They are repeating exactly what they did in our region in 1996.
The UN refugee agency UNHCR has said there is “no clear way out” for the Afghans who are living in danger of the Taliban. As of August 20, 2021, evacuation flights out of Kabul are still ongoing, but access to the airport and finding a flight remain huge challenges for many people.
~~~
Devastating report via NPR
The quick collapse of the Afghan National Army stunned many, including the Pentagon's top military officer, General Mark Milley. He told reporters this week that the U.S. intelligence community estimated that if the U.S. forces withdrew, it would be weeks, months, even years before the Afghan military fell to the Taliban.
Instead, it was just eleven days.
So what happened? How could American officials be so wrong?
The answers lie in the chronic challenges that plagued the Afghan military from the outset, from illiteracy to corruption and incompetence to one of the key problems: a lack of faith in the Kabul government.
Carter Malkasian, a long-time Afghanistan observer, and author of The American War in Afghanistan, seized on that last point in explaining the fall of the country to the Taliban.
The Taliban fought with an ideological fervor and to rid the country of the foreign invaders, values enshrined in Afghan identity.
"It animated the Taliban. It sapped the will of Afghan soldiers and police. When they clashed, Taliban were more willing to kill and be killed than soldiers and police, at least a good number of them," he said.
We have both embedded many times with U.S. and Afghan forces. Some of what we witnessed, and the conversations we had, may help explain the challenges the Afghan army faced.
In 2016, we visited the Kandahar Military Training Center. There we met 23-year-old First Lieutenant Hayatullah Frotan. He was just 14 when he joined the Army and quickly rose through the ranks.
Even back then he told us the government wouldn't help the families of slain soldiers.
"They don't have any policy, any good plan," Frotan told us. "When they lose some personnel."
If they provided for the families with death benefits, he said, "The personnel morale will become high. And they will fight like lions."
Then there was lack of leadership. The Afghan National Army struggled to find qualified commanders to lead the soldiers. Over the years we met Afghan generals praised by the U.S. military, only to find out later the generals were replaced for incompetence or corruption.
Some generals pocketed pay meant for soldiers. Others were supposed to buy the best rice for their troops. Instead they bought the cheapest, and lowest quality possible, and pocketed the difference. Still others sold government-issued firewood meant to keep the troops warm.
Frotan said the system was marked by cronyism, with not enough loyalty to the troops. The leaders were not only corrupt. Some of them were illiterate.
"They don't know how to write, they don't know how to read," Frotan said. "How to be professional soldiers and leadership is very, very important."
The lack of education led to basic problems, like maintaining equipment, from rifles to vehicles to ordering spare parts.
And not knowing how to write meant these leaders couldn't even read the maps properly. NPR was with an Afghan Army unit six years ago, shooting artillery rounds at the Taliban. They were off by a kilometer because they couldn't figure out the proper grid coordinates.
Not only that, Frotan says commanders often had trouble filing simple paperwork to give soldiers time off.
"They don't have enough knowledge so they cannot make a good schedule for their vacation," Frotan said. So with no proper time off, that meant burnout among the troops, which led to high attrition rates.
Years ago, an American general told us that not only couldn't many of the Afghan officers read or write, they couldn't count. He said the Americans at times would draw a large rectangle in the dirt, telling the officers they needed enough soldiers to fill that space.
A HEAVY TOLL
Nearly sixty thousand soldiers and police officers have lost their lives fighting since 2001, the majority just in the past six years, according to the Brookings Institution's Foreign Policy Report.
The high death rate meant a constant flow of new recruits that needed basic training. Few could advance enough to learn the more complex skills. U.S. military trainers like Major Kevin McCormick told us teaching advanced military skills is a time consuming process.
"It takes a lot of time, it is not a short process," McCormick said. "These skills are perishable, they require continuous training, continuous mastery."
In our conversations with Afghan soldiers we also heard other complaints. Commanders deprived troops of SIM cards, so they couldn't call their families. Many soldiers either ended up deserting or not re-enlisting.
Over the years there were more basic challenges. In 2010, NPR was at a combat outpost before dawn with American and Afghan troops. The Americans were all geared up ready to go on patrol. Some of the Afghan forces were half dressed, smelling of hashish and asking for food.
Two years later, NPR was with another American unit. A sergeant was telling his soldiers what he expected of the Afghan soldiers, the ANA. "ANA is going to lead, too. If they don't want to lead, just stop and make them walk ahead of you," he told his soldiers.
The Afghans could do little without U.S. support. The American soldiers in the field knew the truth. But during this time, from the Pentagon to the White House to Congress, officials had the same thing to say: The Afghan Army is getting better every day. They are fighting hard. They are leading.
Many of these problems were outlined in numerous reports by John Sopko, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. But these reports never seemed to resonate with members of Congress, or prompt oversight hearings, like the Fulbright Hearings during the Vietnam War.
When the Taliban started their advancement this year, the Afghan National Army, held together by duct tape and glue, just couldn't hold. Support from American airstrikes against Taliban units dropped off. One soldier told us, the Taliban also gave payments to Afghan soldiers who refused to fight, providing the most money to the officers.
Even high-ranking Afghan military leaders gave up. In an NPR interview an Afghan Air Force colonel who is now hiding in Kabul, said it was impossible to lead in such dire conditions, and that in turn infected the troops.. "The willingness comes from the leadership," he said. "The hope is given to the subordinates from the leadership."
So when the military leaders give up, the unit quickly falls apart — a common occurrence among Afghan Army units.
AFGHAN COMMANDOS
But there was another very powerful fighting force: the Afghan commandos. They were highly trained soldiers, some 22,000 of them among the 300,000 Afghan forces, and they were the backbone of Afghan's fighting power. Over the years they were stretched thin, flying all over the country to back up regular Afghan Army units who couldn't or wouldn't fight. They often complained about this to NPR reporters. One told us they were meant for special missions, not to handle basic operations that were supposed to be the job of rank and file soldiers.
As the Taliban advanced throughout the country during those final weeks, the commandos faced a chilling reality. One commando from the south told us, no one in his unit wanted to surrender. They were there to fight the Taliban. But the Kabul government ordered them to lay down their arms.
"We were no longer safe," the commando said. "We had to take refuge in our friends' houses and now we are hiding."
Another commando from the Kabul unit shared a similar story. "Yes, everybody, hide themselves, and I'm really scared and I have not been outside like three days, four days," he said.
Once all the commando units throughout the country broke down, the Kabul unit was the last one standing. "We didn't fight because the government didn't say you have to fight it," the Kabul commando said. "The Ministry of Defense didn't say you have to fight." It's a political decision, he added, not about the willingness to fight.
Now, the Afghan commandos have either left for other countries or are in hiding. They are ineligible for expedited visas, without a job, an income or any protection. "Last night I was really crying," the commando said. "And also my wife, my kids were crying about this. And I'm presently - I'm jobless. We don't trust the Taliban."
The commandos tell us they feel betrayed. The Afghan authorities, they say, "are not valuable human beings. This is the misfortune of the Afghan people."
This prescient memo was written December, 2016 by a woman by the name of Sharon Furiosa. (If you copy and paste, please be sure to give her credit.)
This is not specifically related to events now unfolding in Afghanistan, but the insights are important to grasping the convoluted political and PR wrinkles of the tale.
I think a lot of people who wonder why more Republicans aren't standing up to tRump and Putin are missing the bigger picture. Putin didn't create the move toward authoritarianism in the US. He took advantage of divisions and right-wing movements active for decades.
Populist and authoritarian movements have existed in the US throughout its history, most notably during and after Reconstruction. The most current incarnation is an unholy trinity consisting of ultra-wealthy oligarchs, religious right, and white nationalists/populists.
Each of these groups has its own set of goals, and each has been working toward controlling US govt. since at least the 1970s. What drove them to overlook differences and work together was election of a black president who attempted to pass health reform.
This is how it worked. In late 60s Republicans undertook Southern Strategy to co-opt bigoted white Democrats to Republican party. They realized that even so they were losing information war and needed to put in place institutions/propaganda to legitimize their policies.
These goals were crystallized in the Powell Memo, which called for business to take America back and laid out the framework for doing so. This memo resulted in a series of actions by business & the right: set up think tanks to legitimize views; undermine media fairness rules, and form media companies to serve as propaganda arms, culminating with formation of Fox News and more recently, Breitbart. At the same time, Evangelicals felt under siege due to the enormous social changes of 60s and 70s - civil rights, women's rights, etc. Many of these organizations hopped on the corporate/Republican bandwagon and spread propaganda through religious media networks
So you had Pat Robertson's 700 Club, Christian radio networks, and a proliferation of televangelists spreading propaganda for Republicans. As these religious groups gained more influence with Republicans, they influenced party policies and platforms.
Interestingly, the religious influence meshed with the corporate influence due to its embrace of "Prosperity Theology". This is a sort of neo-Calvinist view that teaches wealth/success is a sign of god's blessing, and that poverty is the fault of the poor.
This belief has several negative outcomes.
First, it makes poverty a personal problem rather than a systemic problem that govt. can solve.
Second, it prevents examination of the negative effects of income/wealth inequality and the systems that promote it.
It also leads poor to hold out hope that they're just "not rich yet" and to identify with the rich who rig the system for themselves.
The final leg in the unholy trinity is the white nationalists, who have also been known as populists, militia, Neo-Nazis, KKK, etc. These groups have waxed and waned, but tend to revive whenever white men feel a particular threat to their entitlement (Obama/ Hillary). Their interests overlap with religious right, which seeks a biblical rule (Christian Sharia Law if you will) that subordinates women to men.
Wealthy Oligarchs such as Kochs and Mercers funded training and campaigns for far-right candidates. They also worked to undermine restrictions on soft money and influence of wealth on elections through such cases as Citizens United.
Corporate and religious right-wing media stoked a non-stop propaganda machine to gain support of white working class via racism/fear. Putin's interests overlap with the Unholy Trinity (Christianity/Oligarchy/White Nationalism), and situation provided perfect opportunity.
I'm done for now - but keep these things in mind when you wonder why Republicans don't stand up to Putin. They mostly agree with him.
The following was written by Gary Kohls. I'm sharing it here because this Sunday is Peace Sunday, the time we stop to recall the devastation of the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and to rededicate ourselves to the work of peace.
Gary is a Christian peacemaker whose writing I've read as a result of my connections to Every Church a Peace Church (www.ecapc.org). It's a timely history lesson.
Nagasaki is famous in the history of Japanese Christianity. Not only was it the site of the largest Christian church in the Orient, St. Mary’s Cathedral, but it also had the largest concentration of baptized Christians in all of Japan.
It was the city where the legendary Jesuit missionary, Francis Xavier, established a mission church in 1549, a Christian community which survived and prospered for several generations. However, soon after Xavier’s planting of Christianity in Japan, Portuguese and Spanish commercial interests began to be accurately perceived by the Japanese rulers as exploitive, and therefore the religion of the Europeans (Christianity) and their new Japanese converts became the target of brutal persecutions.
Within 60 years of the start of Xavier’s mission church, it was a capital crime to be a Christian. The Japanese Christians who refused to recant of their beliefs suffered ostracism, torture and even crucifixions similar to the Roman persecutions in the first three centuries of Christianity. After the reign of terror was over, it appeared to all observers that Japanese Christianity had been stamped out.
However, 250 years later, in the 1850s, after the coercive gunboat diplomacy of Commodore Perry forced open an offshore island for American trade purposes, it was discovered that there were thousands of baptized Christians in Nagasaki, living their faith in a catacomb existence, completely unknown to the government - which immediately started another purge. But because of international pressure, the persecutions were soon stopped, and Nagasaki Christianity came up from the underground.
And by 1917, with no help from the government, the Japanese Christian community built the massive St. Mary’s Cathedral, in the Urakami River district of Nagasaki. Now it turned out, in the mystery of good and evil, that St. Mary’s Cathedral was one of the landmarks that the Bock’s Car bombardier had been briefed on, and looking through his bomb site over Nagasaki that day, he identified the cathedral and ordered the drop.
At 11:02 am, Nagasaki Christianity was boiled, evaporated and carbonized in a scorching, radioactive fireball. The persecuted, vibrant, faithful, surviving center of Japanese Christianity had become ground zero.
And what the Japanese Imperial government could not do in over 200 years of persecution, American Christians did in 9 seconds. The entire worshipping community of Nagasaki was wiped out.
To the younger Afghans who follow me. What you see now or little to no coverage of afghans rising up against the Taliban and Afghan requests from the international world, this was even worse in the 80s and 90s.
When Afghanistan won the Cold War and then was left completely destitute with no assistance, no retrieval of weapons given, completely broken nation. THIS is why a civil war broke out. This is why tribal leaders started in fighting. Western media + western govts largely to blame.
Just taking this moment to point it out next time you get angry at any certain tribe. It’s largely the biproduct of this silence. Afghans are who Afghans have been waiting for. We show up, we are strong, we don’t back down. Now it’s time we show up for each other and get heard 🇦🇫
And to clarify we see how the rest of the muslim world is silent. Because Afghan needs don’t fit into their agendas. That’s sad and needs to change. Youth across the region should join forces and dismantle all funding and sanctuary of terrorists. Taliban etc. Find a way 🤲🏽
The earth is like a body. Every single thing is connected as part of a single body. If any of us ignore what is happening in other nations, to groups of people, to the wildlife, to the trees and oceans, we will eventually feel it and regret it. The pandemic should have taught us.
Josh Shahryar
Can confirm. In the 90s, it was IMPOSSIBLE to get anyone to care about Afghanistan. I lived in Peshawar. It was the unofficial capital of Taliban in Pakistan. The rest of the world only cared after 9/11. That, too, so Dick Cheney could invade Iraq
sHaH @TheProducteer
Back then we had the Lion of Panjshir Ahmad Shah Massoud trying what he could to control the chaos. Later also against the Taliban. The world ignored it until 911
And it’s encouraging to see how this time across all ethnic groups there is resistance against the Taliban and their insane distortion of Islam. And we have social media so the Afghans have a voice themselves now. And support of many people around the world which experienced AFG.
Ariana Delawari
Yes ! Incredible. Very very positive [Raising hands emoji]